Skip to main content

Great article in the Sacramento News & Review about the $100,000 Homeless Man


There is an important story about homelessness in this week’s [2/16/17] Sacramento News & Review that is centrally about the tormented life of Russell Bartholow, titled “The $100,000 Homeless Man.”

Beyond telling Bartholow’s story, the cover article rightly relates elements of the mountain of problems Bartholow shouldered, to dysfunction in the way the police operate, the stunning befuddlement of the courts and awful decision-making at City Hall

These problems continue, unabated, for struggling homeless people of today.

Bartholow died, surrounded by loved ones, in October from self-administered pain medication that a doctor proscribed. Only then was he freed from a cancer that engorged his body and piles of police citations that exceeded $100,000 in fines

The story of their experience for a majority of today’s struggling homeless Sacramentans, is not as extreme as what Russell Bartholow had to forbear, but it has the same features in making people targets of near-sadistic police and unconscionable laws. The mindless formula of bad police enforcing bad law undermines homeless people’s best efforts to put themselves in control, walking a pathway they foresee that can lead them to a good, wholesome, satisfying life of their own making.

Congratulations go to the reporters who penned the piece, "contributors" John Flynn and Matt Kramer -- two fellas whose names I hadn't seen before in SNR. You rock, John and Matt! From the first page of Flynn & Kramer's "The $100,000 Homeless Man":
Bartholow didn't start out homeless. But, like thousands of others in Sacramento County, once he found himself on the streets, he entered an alternate reality where the government couldn't hear him; where those supposed to help, instead focused on erasing his existence; and where the only permanent home the county offered him was in jail.
Russell Bartholow's sad, trouble story is both painful -- because he seems, certainly, to have been a splendid fellow. And poignant -- because his death seems senseless. But it is a Must Read for people in our county who want a more-just and happy experience for the thousands of homeless folk who are struggling from one day to the next during our long and stormy winter. Pick up a copy of the current SN&R.

While the City council members and county supes have made some positive headway at addressing "the problem" of uplifting homeless people's lives, they fail to tackle the central, immediate issues, which include these: (1) Allowing homeless people to sleep where they can in the absence of there being sufficient shelter space or sufficient land set aside for people to set up tents. (2) The police need to be disallowed to confiscate homeless people's property that they need for warmth and shelter. (3) Homeless people must no longer receive tickets and citations for merely being alive and to suffer harassment from hateful police officers.

----

Addendum: A reader of this blog and a friend, Steve, alerted me to an ongoing project by the British newspaper, The Guardian, looking at homelessness in the United States, called "Outside in America." The project is funded by the Bill Gates Foundation. This is a series that interests me and that I am likely to write about in the near future. Having highly responsible outsiders review what America is doing re homeless people vis-a-vis what England is doing can be instructive.

One recent article from this "project" explores how homeless folk are counted biennially in the U.S. and why the count always seems to miss many people. Title of the piece is, appropriately, "How America counts its homeless -- and why so many are overlooked."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Homeless Hate from Marcos Breton

There was a long spell a handful of years ago when Marcos Breton said something so fully ridiculous in one of his hateful screeds against homeless folk that it appeared to be very apparent he had been taken off the Homeless Beat by his superiors. Unhappily, after a few months, Breton was again writing disparaging columns about homeless folk

In today's Bee [3/5/17], Breton has written one of his longest columns. Online, it is titled "The price downtown Sacramento is paying for Mayor Steinberg’s homeless crusade
"
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/#storylink= It goes on for days. The message, essentially, is this: Homeless people poop; they're getting a great deal of what they want from the overmuch-helpful mayor; and business people proximate to Chavez Park are made miserable by the forever-disgusting homeless that are there in great number.

O.K. Let's get into all this a bit. Except in Breton's mind, homeless pe…

The first-person dimension of homeless Sacramentans suffering from Schizophrenia

"Disabilities and dysfunction process from having been shunned and denied access to needed opportunitites and networks of support."
~ the brothers Lysaker in Schizophrenia and the Fate of the Self What is schizophrenia? How many are homeless Sacramentans?

Perhaps 15% of the Sacramento homeless population suffers from schizophrenia. The percentage is difficult to determine for many reasons that branch from both the fuzzy definition of the malady and that many people within the homeless community who have the illness (1) are in denial and are undiagnosed and (2) have the illness as a diagnosis only – the disability can be faked by people who are successful claimants of social security and other benefits.

What is schizophrenia? One webspace gives us this definition: The most chronic and disabling of the severe mental disorders. Typically develops in the late teens or early twenties. The overt symptoms are hallucinations (hearing voices, seeing visions), delusions (false beliefs ab…

Homelessness and Remembrance

This is a follow-up on the matter of remembering homeless people who have died and the Wall that Libby Fernandez wants to build in remembrance of the deceased. [See earlier blogpost "Tell Libby NOT to build her wall."]

This blogpost is prompted by a Philosophy Bites podcast released in the last couple days -- titled "Cécile Fabre on Remembrance." Fabre's take on why we honor or grieve for certain individuals or certain collections of individuals is not greatly helpful -- since his focus is mainly one of fallen war heroes and war casualties -- but it does open up the issue of why should there be a remembrance effort for deceased homeless people at all. Who is served by it? And has the effort been perverted by the avarice of charities in their insatiable drive for donations.

It is, for starters, a curious thing for "homeless people" to be a collective that is honored. I write that NOT because I don't want the best for homeless people. But, homelessn…